Boris Johnson Claims THIS About Queen Elizabeth II's Death

In the book, which hits shelves on October 10 and has been serialized this week in the 'Daily Mail' newspaper - which Johnson also writes for - he recalled the monarch’s final days at Balmoral, Scotland. Johnson formally stepped down just two days before Elizabeth II’s death in September 2022, and in the years since, there has been fierce speculation over exactly how she passed away.

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has controversially broken royal protocol and claimed in his upcoming memoir that Queen Elizabeth II was suffering from bone cancer before her death.

“I had known for a year or more that she had a form of bone cancer, and her doctors were worried that at any time she could enter a sharp decline,” he wrote in the excerpt.

Johnson’s account is the first public indication by a former senior government official as to what the Queen’s cause of death might have been. It is listed as “old age” on her death certificate.

This claim comes as part of a broader narrative in Johnson’s memoir, which aims to provide insight into his tenure as Prime Minister and the unique relationship he had with the monarchy. He describes the Queen as a figure of immense strength and grace, emphasizing how her illness did not define her character or her service to the nation.

The revelation has elicited varied reactions from the public and royal observers. Some praise Johnson for shedding light on the Queen’s personal struggles, while others criticize him for discussing her health without the consent of her family. The royal family has traditionally maintained a level of privacy regarding the Queen's health, and any disclosures can provoke sensitivities about royal protocols and the respect afforded to the monarchy.

Former British leaders Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron all did so but only in generalities and without the same level of vivid detail as Johnson.

Buckingham Palace has a policy not to comment on books released about the royal family and as such has not confirmed or denied Johnson’s assertions.

“She radiated such an ethic of ­service, patience and leadership that you really felt you would, if necessary, die for her,” he continued. “That may sound barmy to some people (and totally obvious to many more), but that loyalty, primitive as it may appear, is still at the heart of our system.

“You need someone kind and wise, and above politics, to personify what is good about our country. She did that job brilliantly.”

Thinking back on that last time the pair sat together in the Queen’s drawing room, Johnson said that he understood Young’s forewarning.

“She seemed pale and more stooped, and she had dark bruising on her hands and wrists, probably from drips or injections,” he wrote.

“But her mind – as Edward had also said – was completely ­unimpaired by her illness, and from time to time in our conversation she still flashed that great white smile in its sudden mood-lifting beauty.”

Johnson described the weekly prime minster audiences with the monarch as “a privilege” and “a balm.”

Additionally, this disclosure raises ethical questions about the boundaries of political memoirs and the responsibilities of public figures when discussing personal matters of historical figures. The impact of Johnson's remarks could extend beyond mere curiosity, potentially influencing public perceptions of the monarchy and its legacy.

In summary, Boris Johnson's memoir has stirred a conversation about Queen Elizabeth II's health, revealing a side of her story that many were unaware of. As the public grapples with this new information, it also reflects on the intersection of politics, personal history, and the enduring respect for one of the most significant figures in British history.